Art. III, Section 3 of the Constitution states
"Presidents of founded parties may initiate the election of a new president of the republic. Presidents of founded parties may nominate one citizen for the presidency of the republic."
The Libertarian Party is no longer founded, therefore, is Pijanowski's nomination legal?
TITULIA CITY | With the Libertarian Party at 8 members, they are no longer a founded party. BUT, the Constitution REQUIRES that only founded parties may nominate a candidate. Does this make Pres. Hock’s nomination illegal? Pres. Hock is desperate to stay in office due to Linardist President FG Handy inactive and new RNC Pres. Julian refusing to nominate President Hock. PFP Pres. JI981993 told TC he was considering nominating the President, but it was not likely. If he is re-elected, would that make him an ILLEGITIMATE President? Was there some sort of cover up or deal due to the Anti-Admin Party?
OPINION/What do YOU think?
No comments:
Post a Comment